On the Ayodhya dispute, the Bench of two judges led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi formed the Bench of three judges to announce the hearing on January 10. After this the response to the whole matter has also started. The most shocking statement came from the National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah. Abdullah said that this matter should be discussed and the solution should be found. He said, ‘What is the need to take this case to court? I am sure that through dialogue it can be resolved. ” Abdullah also said that Lord Rama is not just Hindus, he is from the whole world. He said, “There is no hatred for anyone from Lord Rama and should not be too. Try to solve the case and make it The day it will happen, I will also go for a stone. ‘
Meanwhile, Abdullah also attacked BJP. He said that BJP has not done anything in the last five years. He said, “BJP has nothing to do with building a temple. These people only talk about the temple to sit on the chair. ‘
In this case, one of the parties, Iqbal Ansari, said that the matter should be settled by the court. Ansari also supported the statement of PM Modi on the temple issue, in which he had asked to wait for the completion of the law process.
Farooq Abdullah’s big statement
Senior Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad said that the decision of the Supreme Court on Ram Temple will be valid. Union Minister Smriti Irani said that there is no need to comment on PM Modi’s statement on this matter.
Let us know that the next hearing will be held on January 10 in the Supreme Court on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute. On January 10, the matter will go to the special bench of the three Supreme Court judges. The names of the judges involved in this bench will be announced on January 6 or 7.
After Justice retired Justice Deepak Mishra, there was no special bench for hearing in this case. CJI said that a regular bench will be formed for hearing the matter, which will return further orders in this case on January 10. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has dismissed the PIL filed by advocate Harinath Ram, in which a daily hearing of Ayodhya dispute was sought. During the hearing in the Supreme Court, there was such a rush that there was no place for foot. When the matter came to CJI, they spoke of hearing on January 10 in a few seconds.
Farooq Abdullah on Ayodhya issue: Bhagwan Ram se kisi ko baer nahi hai na hona chahiye. Koshish karni chahiye suljhane ki aur banane ki. Jis din ye ho jayega main bhi ek patthar lagane jaaonga. Jaldi samadhaan hona chahiye https://t.co/eIBPpvpr8G
— ANI (@ANI) January 4, 2019
What is the whole case(Ayodhya dispute)
On December 6, 1992, the Babri Masjid was dropped in Ayodhya. In this case, there was a criminal case as well as a litigation case. The matter relating to the title dispute is pending in the Supreme Court. On September 30, 2010, Allahabad High High Court had said in the judgment that the middle of the three domes would be Hindus, where at present the idol of Ramlala is.
The second part was given to the Nirmohi Akhara, which included Sita Kitchen and Ram Chaboota, the remaining one-third part was given to the Sunni Central Waqf Board. This decision was challenged by all the parties in the Supreme Court. On May 9, 2011, the Supreme Court restored the status quo by banning the Allahabad High Court verdict. After this, hearing of the case began last year.
202 total views, 1 views today